Without written evidence of an inspection, no proof exists that the fire inspector gave the owner notice:

• A. that a court citation has been issued.
• B. of hazardous conditions or the corrective measures to be taken.
• C. of what rights the owner may have to reduce a fine.
• D. that their occupancy permit will stay in effect.

Answer: (B)

The main idea here is that a fire inspection notice serves as the official record of what hazards were found and what corrective actions are required. Without written evidence, there’s no proof of what hazards the inspector identified or what steps the owner was told to take to fix them. That written detail—hazardous conditions and the corrective measures—is the essential content that shows what needed to be addressed and by when.

That’s why the correct choice focuses on hazardous conditions or the corrective measures to be taken. If there’s no written notice conveying those specifics, you can’t demonstrate what was communicated or what actions were mandated for safety.

The other options don’t fit because they describe items not central to the notice’s purpose: a court citation is a separate legal action, rights to reduce a fine involve administrative procedures, and occupancy permit status is about whether the permit remains valid, not the inspector’s communicated findings and required fixes.